i ask every guest one question, i'm going to ask you. just because i'm amused by your response. how many times in your life, mr. president, have you been properly in love? >> translator: i'm in love with all of humanity. i love all human beings. >> that may be the best answer i've ever heard. >> that's probably the best answer i've had to that question. you can't beat the whole of

humanity. mr. president, thank you for your time. >> translator: god bless you, i wish you success. >> thank you, sir. we begin tonight keeping them honest on the campaign trial. each appeareded on "60 minutes." mr. obama made news for what some are calling a gaffe, and romney certainly did, we'll talk about that shortly on the big headline getter. first mr. romney's big head line getter on health care. >> does the government have responsible to provide health care to the 50 million americans who don't have care today? >> we do provide care for someone who doesn't have insurance. if someone has a heart attack, they don't sit in their apartment and die, we pick them up in an ambulance and take them to the hospital and give them care, and different states have different ways of providing for that care. >> that's the most expensive way to do it. in the emergency room. >> again, different states have different ways of doing that. some provide that care through clinics, some provide the care

through emergency rooms. in my state we found a solution that worked for my state. i wouldn't take what we did in massachusetts and say to texas, you have to take the massachusetts model. >> he points to the emergency room as a viable alternative for the uninsured. that's precisely his massachusetts model, that's what he's trying to eliminate by providing universal coverage. it was mitt romney's rational for his own plan back in 2010. here he is back then on msnbc's "morning joe." >> do you believe in universal coverage? >> oh, sure. look, it doesn't make a lot of sense for us to have millions and millions of people who have no health insurance and yet who can go to the emergency room and get entirely free care for which they have no responsibility. particularly if there are people who have sufficient means to pay their own way. >> that was 2010, as you can see in this clip from three years before, what mitt romney says about health care seems to depend on who's asking him about it. here's what he said in 2007 to

glenn beck. >> actually, what we have right now is the road to socialism. what we have right now in health care is creeping socialism with more and more people going on medicaid and medicare, and those who don't have insurance, when they show up at the hospital, they get care. they get free care, paid for by you and me. >> right. >> if that's not a form of socialism, i don't know what is. >> three occasions, over five years, three very different takes on health care. as we said, mr. obama made news as well. joining us to talk about it, paul begala, advising the leading pro-obama super pac. also republican strategist alex castellenos. paul, even though it seems like romney has pretty much been all over the map when it comes to people without insurance in turning to the emergency room for basic care, does a flip-flop or change in position on an issue like this really resonate with voters? >> i actually have never been one as a democratic strategist and i advise the super pac that's trying to defeat governor romney and re-elect the president, so i have a dog in this hunt. we never attacked him for the flip-flopping not because we think he's not but it's more important to show the damage he would do to the mile class.

that's the problem here. once again he seemed to be really out of touch, really callous about people who don't have health insurance, who might have a heart attack and die. he says well, they don't die in their apartment. actually, they do sometimes, governor. there was a harvard, might have been keiser, study that said 40,000 americans a year die because they don't have health insurance. that's the problem, he looks once again like he's not on the side of middle class people. >> alex, does he seem out of touch on this issue? >> oh, i don't think so. i think first of all, when you've lost as many races as i have, i've ended up in a lot of emergency rooms and there a problem with american health care, and everyone will acknowledge it, and that is that doctors in america don't tell anybody no. hospitals are required by law not to tell anybody no so we do provide care, but there are some people out there who do split their pills in half because they can't afford it. there are some people out there who don't go to get care because they feel responsible to pay for it and they know they can't.

but i think romney's point here was that we have a health care system that is providing a lot of care at we are not paying for, and that's what he was addressing. >> paul, another sound bite from "60 minutes" last night, something the president said the romney campaign has been all over today. let's play what the president said. >> i was pretty certain and continue to be pretty certain that there are going to be bumps in the road. there will probably be some times where we bump up against some of these countries and have strong disagreements, but i do think that over the long term, we're more likely to get a middle east and north africa that is more peaceful, more prosperous and more aligned with our interests. >> now, mitt romney today has been all over the phrase bumps in the road. was that a poor choice in words on the president's part as governor romney is saying? does it sounds like he's downplaying thousands of deaths in syria, the killing of our ambassador and three others?

>> i think that's the risk that comes with this president's extraordinarily low blood pressure. he's a very cool customer. and there's a lot of good in that, though. you don't want a president talking about international crises who looks like a hothead or goes off half-cocked. part of why governor romney looked bad responding to the tragedy in benghazi, he seemed like he was too political and too opportunistic. it could be here that the president was a little too cool. i don't think in his defense for a minute he would say that the murder of an ambassador and other american personnel, much less all the other folks who have died in that region, is just a bump in the road. i think what he's trying to do is show everybody that we're on this, the united states is doing well and you know, i think that's a kind of typical no drama obama response. >> alex, is that what it is, the cool head of the president? or more? >> i think there's something to that, but i think there's also a little more, and that is that this president's great strength is his intellect. he lives inside his head and his ideas. and part of it is he doesn't really feel your pain like paul's former boss, bill clinton, but he can memorize a

study about it, you know. people are distant from this president. there's a certain sense of arrogance to this white house that they're just detached from it and i think that's a vulnerability. we have two elite candidates running for president. we have an academic elite, barack obama, running against financial elite. so the middle class is up for grabs here. >> alex, i want to ask you about something i saw you tweet over the weekend. you said and i quote, when i see romney he looks look a candidate. when i see obama he looks like a president. this should not be hard to fix, so fix it. what do you mean? wasn't one of the governor's big selling points during the primary season the idea that he did look presidential? >> you know, as a candidate -- as the person himself, yes, i think mitt romney looks very presidential but he's out there on the trail now and every time i turn on my tv, it's the same political rally with paul ryan d the same crowd around him state after state after state, and it looks like a political beauty pageant. it looks like politics, not like governing. you don't want to run for president looking like a candidate.

you want to run for president looking like a president. and i think doing some more important things, for example, go where the problem is, mitt romney, go to an inner city and find out what's happened to the american family that's falling apart. go where the problem is. go to an unemployment line, talk to some people, but quit having political events. >> alex castellanos, paul begala, thank you. let you know what you think, we're on facebook or follow me on twitter. up next, latest developments on libya and how some of the story came to light.

>> announcer: meet tom, a proud

dad ose online friends all "like" the photos he's posting. oscar likes tom's photos, but he loves the access to tom's personal information. oscar's an identity thief who used tom's personal info to buy new teeth and a new car, and stuck tom with the $57,000 bill. [tires squeal] now meet carl who works from the coffee shop and uses the free wi-fi. marie works from there too. she's an identity thief who used a small device to grab his wi-fi signal, then stole enough personal information to hijack and drain his bank accounts. every year, millions of americans learn all it may take to devastate your life is a little personal information in the wrong hands. this is identity theft and no one helps stop it better than lifelock. lifelock offers the most comprehensive identity theft protection, period. ordinary credit monitoring services may take 30 days to alert you. lifelock's 24/7 proactive protection would have alerted tom as soon as they noticed an

attack within their network, before it was too late. and lifelock's bank account takeover alerts could have notified carl in time to help him protect his money. lifelock protects your social security number, money, credit, even the equity in your home. while identity theft can't be completely stopped, no one protects you better than lifelock, and lifelock stands behind that with the power of their $1 million service guarantee. you have so much to protect and nothing to lose when you call lifelock right now and try 60 days of identity theft protection risk-free. 60 days risk-free. use promo code: be secure order now and get this document shredder, a $29 value free. [♪...] call or go online now. [♪...]

keeping them honest now on a story involving the death of four distinguished americans in libya involving how well or how poorly the u.s. government handled its responsibility to protect them, involving government transparency or the lack of it and lastly involving ourselves. "360" and cnn have become part of the story. that is the last place i or anyone in this profession ever want to be. we as a program and cnn as a network have believed from the beginning that the focus should be on four key points, on the killing of ambassador christopher stevens and three others in benghazi, libya on 9/11, on what the state department and others may have known about the security situation the days and weeks leading up to their killing, on what leading members of the government have said about their circumstances of the tragedy and whether their statements have lacked clarity or transparency, and of course, on who killed these four dedicated americans. that's where we've always believed the focus should be. however, because cnn discovered ambassador stevens' seven-page journal in what remains of the consulate in benghazi three days after the attack and because it

became one source for some of our reporting, questions about the use and handling of that journal have been raised, as you probably heard. as you probably heard this weekend, the u.s. state department spokesman blasted cnn, calling the network's behavior quote, disgusting and our handling of the journal quote, indefensible. now, no one likes to be called disgusting, particularly by a spokesperson for the united states state department. but we do invite you and them to hold us to the same standards that we hold others and try every night to meet ourselves. out of respect for his family, we have not quoted from his journal, not once. ambassador stevens' journal. it was not e-mailed around the newsroom as the u.s. state department spokesman said it was. remember, cnn discovered the journal three days after the assault. arwa damon, one of the best war correspondents i ever worked with who reported for years at great personal risk to herself, discovered the journal. why was the journal significant? well, at the time that cnn discovered it, the obama administration, remember, was still downplaying the possibility that this was a deliberate terrorist attack, but

was instead part of the violent reaction all over the arab world to that anti-muslim youtube video. this is what they were publicly saying then. >> this is a fairly volatile situation and it is in response, not to united states policy, not to obviously the administration, not to the american people. it is in response to a video, a film, that we have judged to be reprehensible and disgusting. that in no way justifies any violent reaction to it. >> now, even in that early stage, many in the foreign policy and global security community doubted that explanation. the journal certainly raises questions about that. neither "360" nor cnn rushed to air with details from the journal. we didn't publicly announce we had found it and within hours of finding it, we informed the family of ambassador stevens. cnn did not publicly announce we had found it out of respect for the family. instead, as cnn does with every story, our correspondents and our producers sought as many

other sources as we could find and in fact, we found three other sources, including one who had a detailed conversation with the ambassador which confirmed much of what we felt important in the journal. this is how we reported it on wednesday on this program. >> a source familiar with ambassador stevens' thinking says that in the months before his death, he talked about being worried about what he called the never-ending security threats specifically in benghazi. the source telling us that the ambassador specifically mentioned the rise in islamic extremism, the growing al qaeda presence in libya, and said he was on an al qaeda hit list. >> now, no mention there of e ambassador's journal. on friday, cnn received inquiries from other media outlets who somehow had gotten wind of the existence of the journal, and mistakenly believed that cnn had not turned it over to the family. cnn had already done so-and-so to be transparent on friday's broadcast i briefly mentioned the journal. now, throughout all of this, we tried to minimize the anguish the ambassador's family is

obviously feeling, balanced against our journalistic duty to inform. ambassador stevens held a very prominent and public position and as a news organization, it's our job to inform you of information that's important. this was not broadcasting gossip from the pages of someone's diary. this was not reporting salacious details of someone's private life. this was reporting information that could impact the national security of the united states and the safety of u.s. installations in other countries. we have just learned, for instance, that the benghazi mission was operating under a security waiver at the time of the attack. that means that typical security standards did not apply, mainly because the compound was temporary in nature. we don't yet know who made that decision or who was in on it but we do think that people need to know where the process broke down, if it broke down. we think you need to know what happened to u.s. personnel in benghazi. we've got a lot to talk about tonight with former homeland security adviser fran towsend. as we often mention, fran's a member of the external advisory committee, and recently visited libya with her employer. also joining us, former cia officer bob baer. i don't want to get into the journalistic details with you,

but there's no doubt, what do you make of the fact that this consulate in benghazi three days after the attack apparently wasn't being guarded and journalists are wandering all over the place, and anybody could have been wandering all over the place. >> anderson, lost in the dispute over the journal is the fact that this calls into question the integrity of what is now an fbi investigation. one of the first thing law enforcement officers do when they begin an investigation is secure the crime scene. first and foremost, this is the consulate. now, they were going to have challenges to that. the fbi couldn't get in because of security conditions. u.s. personnel, nonessential personnel had been sent home. there were fewer to do that. but the fbi, frankly, once they opened an investigation, ordinarily should have and may have, we don't know, but should have coordinated with their u.s. government agency counterparts. if they couldn't secure it, you ask the host government. if the host government is incapable, we did fly in additional marines to guard the embassy in tripoli. was there military u.s. personnel available to help

secure it? obviously that didn't happen. it's one of those unanswered questions we don't know but what we do know is the consequences of failing to secure the crime scene absolutely will call into question the integrity of the information that's gathered there. >> bob, what does this say to you, that this site was not secured? >> anderson, i think the whole thing's just outrageous. i completely agree with fran. look, that consulate was overrun and we don't even begin to understand what was lost there. we've lost crypto, files, money, personal documents. we don't even know, this administration is not telling us. the fact that the diary was found in the consulate, and the fact that there wasn't -- i've heard that there's a quick reaction force tried to get to the consulate but was attacked at the airport, benghazi airport. this hasn't been confirmed, but what's happened in libya, we've lost complete control of this. every investigation i've been involved in, whether assassination or blown-up

embassy, there's always been a local force or marines to secure the site, otherwise the fbi can't do its work. it just can't. if it's completely wrecked like it was in benghazi, and i think the reason that the state department is so sensitive about your finding the journal is because they've lost control. >> pivoting now, the actual attack, particularly destruction of the so-called annex where u.s. officials were operating sensitive government programs, how important was that mission, you think, to u.s. intelligence? >> oh, absolutely vital. that was, as i understand, is where they were buying up weapons, trying to buy up chemical weapons, trying to buy up surface-to-air missiles. it was u.s. intelligence was just getting started in libya. that's where they kept their files and i said the communications gear, which apparently no one can explain what's happened to it. this has never happened to an american embassy since tehran in 1979. it's really catastrophe, it really is. >> i just read another report by

a journalist who was able to get into the annex and walk around relatively unfetterred. bob said this operation really hurts the u.s. in libya. do you agree with that? >> no question it really hurts us. look, we don't rely on any single installation or capability in the u.s. intelligence community, so what you have to do now is rely more on all the other capabilities so you'll have signals intelligence, you'll rely on the local force but let's remember, the local force was decimated after the fall of the gadhafi government and so they're just rebuilding. you're not the only intelligence service in libya so you're going to have allies who have intelligence networks there, you're going to have to rely on them. so all of this, but you're going to have lost this critical foothold in an area, as we have all discussed the rising, you know, extremism in the east of libya, you lose this piece at a critical time. >> there is certainly on the good news, in terms of on the ground in libya, is this rising up against militant groups in benghazi that we saw last week.

>> absolutely. look, anderson, as i said to you, when i was there at the end of august, i had raised these militias inside tripoli. i can only imagine how much worse they were because everyone talked about to the east, the growing problem and so if this tragedy has been the impetus to have the libyans act themselves against the militias, that is a good outcome. it has to be sustained over a period of time. they have to be able to fill that vacuum. but this is a good development. >> what i think a lot of people don't understand about the intelligence community is just how dangerous the work of intelligence operatives is overseas. you can't do this from behind the walls of an embassy. you have to get out there and mingle, right? >> look, anderson, intelligence is always collected one-on-one. you can't go out without an armored convoy, with contractors

and the rest. it's supposed to be clandestine. so what we have now is a country and this is in other countries in the middle east where intelligence officers are not allowed outside of compounds. on the other hand, the locals are loathe to come inside an american compound because they have to pass through local guards and nobody in their right mind is going to take that risk to have a local look at their i.d., be identified as a potential american contact and what this is leading to, if the middle east continues to get worse, is a blindness about what's going on there and i cannot emphasize enough how serious this is, if this should all turn against us like it did in libya. >> you say, fran, it is possible to work with other nations' intelligence services? >> that's right. you just have far less control than you do over your own assets and you have much more difficulty in tasking them against what we call our requirements. that is, we have priorities that we want to have filled. they're not going to fill our priorities. they are going to fill theirs. our closest allies will share what information they gather but again, it's sort of as bob describes, you become one more step removed and you become a recipient and far less control of your assets.

>> fran townsend, appreciate it. bob baer, thank you very much. all this week we're focusing on the top five social issues that keep americans up at night. we have been doing this for weeks looking at various issues. the issues that could decide the election. just ahead, same sex marriage. where the candidates stand and how that could help or hurt them on election day. save up to 40% on select hotels. so book your hotel now and save up to 40%. hurry, offer ends soon. book now at travelocity.

new question for disabled veterans charity that's given as far as we can tell very little money to actual veterans. its chief fund-raising company is feeling new heat when we continue. gence with minimal collateral damage. but rather than neutralizing enemies in their sleep, you'd be targeting stocks to trade. well, that's what trade architect's heat maps do. they make you a trading assassin.

trade architect. td ameritrade's empowering web-based trading platform. trade commission-free for 60 days, and we'll throw in up to $600 when you open an account.

fall arrived over the weekend. the election is now just 43 days away. tonight we continue our look at issues in 2012.

the ones that matter most to voters. we polled registered voters to identify the top five social issues this week that keep you up at night. tonight, we start with number five which is same sex marriage. according to cnn/orc polling, more than half of americans support same sex marriage although the issue divides the country. zach walls gave a speech at the democratic national convention about growing up with two moms. listen. >> my name is zach walls. i'm a sixth generation iowan and eagle scout and i was raised by my two moms, jackie and terry. now, people always want to know what it's like having lesbian parents. so i'll let you in on a little secret, i'm awesome at putting the seat down. otherwise, we're like any other family. we eat dinner, we go to church, we have chores. >> he has also written a book "my two moms, lessons of love, strength and what makes a family."

the issue of same sex marriage is obviously very personal for him. here's what he told us concerns him most. >> what keeps me up at night about this issue of gay marriage is that other people stay up at night thinking about gay marriage. now, i identify as somebody who, is very kind of concerned with how things affect me, how they affect my fami. but in terms of how this affects other people, you know, i don't get it. a lot of times we hear well, you know, they don't have family values or they're not, you know, a traditional family because they don't value the same things we do, or think that the same morals we think are important matter, and that's just not true. my moms are two of the most loving and committed people i have ever had the pleasure of knowing. there are nights i remember jackie holding terry, who is six, seven inches taller than she is, as terry just laid on

the bed whimpering in pain from her multiple sclerosis and watching that, and you know, my moms taught me once that love is giving somebody the power to destroy you and trusting them not to. and my moms taught me that, not just by saying it, but by showing it to me, to my sister. when i hear that folks are staying up at night worried about the scourge of same sex marriage, i wonder who these people are and i wish they could come over and have dinner with and my moms and just get to know us on a personal level, because i think fundamentally, love is love. and the idea that we should be recognizing, you know, one kind of relationship between straight people but say that well, gay love, that's not real love, it doesn't really deserve our recognition is not what america's about. i think that at the end of the day, americans are going to recognize the power of love is

greater than the power of fear. >> joining me now is chief white house correspondent jessica yellin and chief political analyst, gloria borger and john king. john, the polls show increasing support for legalizing same sex marriage, particularly among younger voters. how important is that electorally. >> it's a big question, because the issue is not as big as it was back in 2004 when george w. bush closed every speech at the end talking about his support for a constitutional amendment banning same sex marriage. he was trying to gin up conservative support. we can look at the polling data and there is no question, no question at all, public opinion has changed in recent years. this is our most recent cnn/orc poll. you see here a majority of americans, 54%, say marriage between gay or lesbian couples should be recognized as valid. so a majority of americans support same sex marriage. if you look at these numbers from gallup, you can see how public opinion has changed over time. yellow line is those who say it should not be valid. the green line is those who favor same sex marriage. you notice right here, sometime in late 2010, 2011, those lines crossed to where you have even in the gallup numbers now, a majority saying yes, country's

split 50-48 saying no and the gallup numbers. here's the interesting part. does it help the president gin up turnout on college campuses and the like. if you look at states where -- the six states, let me move this out of the way, if you look at the six states where same sex marriage are allowed, those are the very light green states here, two of them, iowa and new hampshire are presidential battlegrounds. we might get a sense on election day if it helps on the margins. >> jessica, has the president shifted -- i mean, it's one of the largest shifts on an issue socially or otherwise. has it had an impact on his campaign? >> well, he highlights his move on gay marriage and on gay rights in general regularly and they embraced it as a positive. in two different ways, he talks about his work overturning don't ask, don't tell, extending federal benefits to same sex partners and opposing the defense of marriage act as a sign of promises kept from the 2008 campaign. so you can see that as an outreach to the 4% of gay and lesbian voters who we saw turned out in the 2008 elections. but then also, he talks about gay marriage to some extent as a sign of i think it's the

difference with mitt romney and the kind of social agenda mitt romney would embrace if he were elected, a stark difference between the two campaigns. >> it is really interesting, gloria, because the two campaigns could not be any more different on this issue, and even in the rhetoric that they use, i don't think i have heard mitt romney in a stump speech, certainly not at the rnc, say the word gay or talk about gay americans who are citizens in this country or lesbian americans who are citizens in this country. you just don't hear it, obviously he opposes same sex marriage. he also opposes i guess civil unions although he has shown some support for some kind of domestic partnership arrangement. yet he doesn't really say it in the speech. in 1994, when he was running for u.s. senate in massachusetts, he pledged that he would be better on equal rights for gays and lesbians than ted kennedy. >> right. he did, and if you recall during that race, he was also pro-choice which he has flipped his opinion on. look, this is a very difficult issue for him, but it's an issue

i would say, anderson, on all the social issues, it's the one at which he has been the most consistent, because he has always said that he is opposed to gay marriage, even when the state of massachusetts approved gay marriage in 2003, when he was governor, he said you know what, we don't want to become san francisco. so at least on this social issue, he has been more consistent. when i asked him, for example, about flip-flopping on abortion and how he's changed his position on that, his answer was well, president obama has changed his position on gay marriage. so again, you know, this is at least one area he's been consistent, but he also doesn't like to talk about social issues very much. it's not his comfort level. he likes to talk about the economy. he wants to make this race about the economy and of course, he doesn't want to alienate younger voters who overwhelmingly support gay marriage. >> interesting. jessica yellin, gloria borger, thank you. john king as well, thanks. following a lot more tonight. susan hendrix joins us with the

"360 bulletin." susan? >> anderson, what to do about syria's civil war is a key issue as diplomats from around the world gather in new york this week for the u.n. general assembly. opposition activists say at least 123 people were killed in the country today. a top u.n. diplomat says their goal is to increase pressure on the government to stop the violence. two u.s. marine staff sergeants are facing a court martial for urinating on dead taliban fighters and posing for photos like this one. video of the july 2011 incident was also posted on youtube in january. three other marines have also been disciplined for it. check out these incredible photos from brazil, where a truck spun out of control and teetered over a bridge. amazingly, the driver was not hurt. it took 25 minutes, though, for rescuers to free him from the dangling truck by rope. a four foot long seafood storage bin from japan was found off oahu, hawaii last week 18 months after it was swept out to sea when the tsunami hit the asian country.

anderson, back to you. >> wow, that's amazing. susan, thanks. we've been reporting on the disabled national veterans foundation which sounds legitimate, right, and its chief fund-raiser, which is -- art for months. what we've uncovered has triggered outrage and multiple investigations. tonight, the stakes are climbing higher. just ahead, drew griffin's report on what he found. chantix is proven to help people quit smoking. it reduces the urge to smoke. some people had changes in behavior, thinking or mood, hostility, agitation, depressed mood and suicidal thoughts or actions while taking or after stopping chantix. if you notice any of these stop taking chantix and call your doctor right away. tell your doctor about any history of depression or other mental health problems, which could get worse while taking chantix. don't take chantix if you've had a serious allergic or skin reaction to it. if you develop these stop taking chantix and see your doctor right away as some can be life-threatening. if you have a history of heart or blood vessel problems, tell your doctor if you have new or worse symptoms. get medical help right away

if you have symptoms of a heart attack. use caution when driving or operating machinery. common side effects include nausea, trouble sleeping and unusual dreams. it helps to have people around you... they say, you're much bigger than this. and you are. [ male announcer ] ask your doctor if chantix is right for you.

so i brought it to mike at meineke. we gave her car a free road handling check. i like free. free is good. my money. my choice. my meineke. [ sneezes ] [ male announcer ] if you have yet to master the quiet sneeze... ♪ [ sneezes ] [ male announcer ] you may be an allergy muddler. try zyrtec®. it gives you powerful allergy relief. and zyrtec® is different than claritin® because zyrtec® starts working at hour 1

on the first day you take it. claritin® doesn't start working until hour 3. [ sneezes ] [ male announcer ] zyrtec®. love the air. join zyrtec® rewards. save up to $7 on zyrtec® products. join zyrtec® rewards. sleep train's inveis ending soon. sale save 10%, 20%, even 35% on a huge selection of simmons and sealy clearance mattresses.

get 2 years interest-free financing on tempur-pedic. even get free delivery! sleep train stacks the savings high to keep the prices low. but hurry, the inventory clearance sale is ending soon. superior service, best selection, lowest price, guaranteed. ♪ sleep train ♪ your ticket to a better night's sleep ♪

another keeping them honest report. for months now, we've been telling you about the disabled national veterans foundation, how it's been under investigation by the senate finance committee as a result of our reporting showing little, if any of the millions, tens of millions it's received in donations over the years, actually went to help disabled veterans. well, tonight we now know that the dvnf is part of an even larger investigations involving its chief fund-raising company. it's a company based right here in new york that says it's one of the world leaders in servicing charities. so far, no one will appear on camera to answer our questions. drew griffin has asked repeatedly. take a look. >> i understand that, but what i want to know is am i going to get an on-camera interview?

all right. okay. so the bottom line is you're not going to give me an interview. drew griffin, g-r-i-f-f-i-n. >> he's not here. >> i'm trying to reach mr. shuloff. oh, he's not in. >> now, quadriga art has called our reporting biased. they say we've ignored the good we're doing for their clients. but they will not go on camera. tonight they may have a lot more than cnn to worry about. drew has been investigating the trail of donated money and is reporting the stakes have just gotten a lot higher. what have you learned? >> we have learned that the charity's bureau of new york state attorney general's office has begun its own investigation of quadriga arts. so too has california's attorney general. now we learned the state of florida also looking into all of this. the investigations beginning after cnn exposed the disabled veterans national foundation, this charity that's raised $70 million since 2007 in the name of disabled veterans and as far as we can tell, has given very little, if any, money to the actual disabled vets. it's gone mostly to quadriga art, this fund-raising company. >> almost from the very

beginning, this whole charity was in some sort of trouble. you've known that. >> this is a very complex story that my producer, david fitzpatrick and i have been digging into. what really happened is they're accused of trying to jump-start itself by making them look like another charity. you might consider it identity theft of a charity. back in 2005, before there was a disabled veterans national foundation, dvnf, there was another charity with a very similar name. the disabled veterans living memorial fund, dvlmf. its sole purpose was to raise enough money for a memorial on this site near capitol hill in washington. the executive director of th group was this guy. his name is larry rivers. he's a retired marine officer. the memorial foundation raised enough money to build the memorial and essentially stopped raising money. here's what happened next. the president of the newly formed dvnf in 2007 went to that marine officer for advice. larry rivers was being paid by quadriga art as a consultant. he referred dvnf to his private

company who was being paid by quadriga art. soon thereafter according to documents obtained by cnn, the newly formed charity dvnf were accused of in effect stealing the identity of that charity that wanted to build the memorial by using the mailing list of its donors and the logo of the dvlnf. we're learning all this from the state of florida which is nearing an end to its own investigation of the dvnf. there was a threatened lawsuit from the memorial fund charity against dvnf which claimed intellectual property rights had been violated. by quadriga art and the dvnf. to fend off that lawsuit, the disabled veterans national foundation paid the memorial fund $325,000, agreeing to the payment because they had already used the mailing list. dvnf then sent an e-mail to cnn saying that quote, the agreement speaks for itself, denied any wrongdoing and since then, as we been reporting as gone on to

raise $70 million, almost all of it going straight into the coffers of quadriga art. despite that, they consider themselves a success because they increased their donor list from zero to some 2 million donors in just five years. >> that's what's so crazy to me and upsetting to me, is that for dvnf it seems like this is all about increasing the mailing list to get more donors, they can raise more money, because this contract, a lot of the money seems to be going to quadriga art. the senate's investigating. is there still money out there? what do we know? >> the root problem here, anderson, is the money that americans are giving to many, many charities are not going to the people that they are believed going to. in other words, if i gave money for disabled vets, it's going to quadriga art. i don't give that money because it's going to be used to build a mailing list. if you said to me give us $10 so our charity can eventually build a mailing list that in ten years from now, we might give money to disabled vets, that's the problem.

we went to roger craver, a nonprofit fund-raising expert in this field and we asked him what he thought about this. here's what he had to say. >> the fact that a company puts forth money for this purpose is not unethical, per se, and it's not illegal per se. what is problematic is if you're promising -- the charity is promising to do something with the money a donor sends and there's no money going to it, which is what you said, drew, if no money is going to the charitable purpose, then that's fraudulent. >> to me, if you're not doing anything wrong, have an interview. it's a huge company, they got tons of p.r. people, i'm guessing. you have probably been dealing with them for years. dvnf. submit to an interview if you want to be transparent. what have we learned about quadriga art? >> we have been hearing from a lot of charities that quite

frankly had no idea what they were getting into with this company. they are upside down. tomorrow night we will come back on your show and report about nearly a dozen of these charities that are in debt, none of them have gotten very much money, if at all, for their charities, and you mentioned, you know, quadriga art not talking to us. mark shuloff is the ceo of this company. he works down the street. he lives up the street. he must pass by time warner center every single day. he won't talk to us on camera, but he did release this web video to his clients over the weekend. we are going to give you a snippet of it right here. >> the irony here is cnn has reported that we have made millions of dollars taking advantage of veterans or the dvnf. nothing could be further from the truth. at the start of this year, my board asked me to have an independent audit done to see how much money we've made serving the dvnf and to date, my company has not made a profit. >> we've been accused of not telling the whole truth abt quadriga art. we have again asked them for interviews.

we will put his entire unedited statement up on the website. anybody wants to see his entire statement that he put on his website, you can get the link right there. meantime, we would like him to talk to us. >> there's a lot of detail. the devil's in the detail, what are salaries, what are costs you're paying out -- >> exactly. keep in mind this is a privately held company. we had strong limitations on what we could learn. we have a lot of inside information from sources quite frankly inside that company. >> to me, the bottom line, any charity, it's all about transparency. and anyone who is donating money has a right to know where that money is going. >> the good ones open their books. others don't. >> drew griffin, we'll have more on it tomorrow. we'll see if dvnf responds. i got into a twitter battle with them last time we were on but even then, then all of a sudden they just went silent because they stopped responding. because they got nothing to say, it seems like. more tomorrow. new developments in the mysterious killing of a couple in st. maarten. police make an arrest. details ahead. [ male announcer ] eligible for medicare?

that's a good thing, but it doesn't cover everything. only about 80% of your part b medical expenses. the rest is up to you. so consider an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company. like all standardized medicare supplement plans, they help save you up to thousands in out-of-pocket costs. call today to request a free decision guide. with these types of plans, you'll be able to visit any doctor or hospital that accepts medicare patients... plus, there are no networks, and you'll never need a referral

to see a specialist. join the millions who have already enrolled in the only medicare supplement insurance plans endorsed by aarp... and provided by unitedhealthcare insurance company, which has over 30 years of experience behind it. with all the good years ahead, look for the experience and commitment to go the distance with you. call now to request your free decision guide.

more from anderson in a moment. first a 360 news and business bulletin. two parking garages are shut down as police investigate a bomb threat at dulles international airport outside of washington. several flights were delayed because crew members were held back by the police activity there. a suspect will appear in court in st. maarten tomorrow, in the case of an american couple found stabbed to death in their home on the island.

police are not sure of a motive in the case. in nepal, three people are still missing in an avalanche that killed at least eight people. authorities say the avalanche was most likely caused by a large piece of ice from a falling glacier. a federal appeals court has ruled the u.s. army corps of engineers is not liable for the massive flooding in new orleans in the lower ninth ward following hurricane katrina. how about this? a new sales record for the new iphone 5. apple has sold more than 5 million phones since they went on sale on friday. demand is so high, that some people who ordered them over the weekend will have to wait until october to get them. anderson? time for the shot, this comes from the zoo where gorillaed seem captivated by all things, a caterpillar. some of them come in for a closer look. you can see the caterpillar there on the fence there. >> can you think of anything else that is compelling to certain types of primates.

we knew this was coming. we can never resist any excuse to show you -- >> i did not know this was coming. >> entertaining apes, we're thinking a caterpillar will do. >> for those of you who don't know what this is. it requires so much explanation i don't know how to begin to explain it. it was at the great ape trust. >> i apologize. >> 20 seconds will not -- it was at the great ape trust. and a rabbit -- the scientist said it was legitimate, they said the apes wanted me to, there's an ape that does sign -- i don't know. >> blame the scientists, they made you do it. >> i kept expecting ashton kutcher to jump out and say i was punked. susan, thanks. coming up, would you vote for a mayoral candidate called tuxedo stan? the "ridiculist" is next. so book your hotel now and save up to 40%. hurry, offer ends soon. book now at travelocity.

time now for the "ridiculist." tonight while the presidential campaign heats up here in the united states, we don't want to neglect a very important mayoral race that is going on right now in canada. we usually don't take sides politically but i think we'll make an exception. go ahead and give our unofficial endorsement to one candidate for mayor of halifax. his name is tuxedo stan. he's 3 years old and he's running to raise awareness about the stray cat problem in halifax. now, sounds like it's a pretty big problem. as a matter of fact, tuxedo stan's owner says it's a veritable cat explosion in the city. you thought i would say catastrophe, didn't you? yes. no. it's not going to happen. that is my solemn promise to you, the viewer, tonight. this is a serious story about a serious mayoral race in halifax. but yes, there's totally a cat

explosion. >> the problem is we have an explosion of cats. we've got literally hundreds, thousands of cats that are living on the street. >> so tuxedo stan's campaign is all about raising awareness about spaying and neutering but we wondered how exactly did stan's owners come up with the idea for him to actually run for office. >> it's a great idea and i don't know exactly where it came from. we were just sitting around a table one night and people said how about tuxedo stanley. >> that settles it. i want to go to a canadian dinner party as soon as possible. just sitting around the table with some people, next thing you know your cat is running for mayor. of course, he's not going to win. municipal law bans animals from holding office. unfortunately, if he's serious about politics, maybe tuxedo stan should come to the united states. just look at the mayor in alaska, stubs the cat has been the mayor for 15 years. i'm not kidding. residents elected him as a write-in candidate when he was just a kitten. the rest is history. not only that, right now as we speak, there's a cat running for senate from virginia. >> he's an accomplished